Judge Analisa Torres also ruled Thursday that the Alabama woman accusing the rapper of raping her in 2000 could proceed anonymously at this early stage of the litigation.

Jay-Z’s efforts to dismiss a case accusing him of raping a then-13-year-old girl in 2000 have been denied by a judge, who also granted the “Jane Doe” accuser the ability to proceed anonymously, despite efforts from the rap mogul’s legal team to have her reveal her identity publicly.

The judge denied the motion for dismissal on Thursday, as well as a motion to reveal the accuser’s identity; she is currently anonymously known as “Jane Doe.” U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres ruled that Doe is “particularly vulnerable to the possible harms of disclosure” ( per ABC News) and that her identity will remain protected at this “exceedingly early stage in this case.

Jay-Z and Sean 'Diddy' Combs' accuser does not have to reveal her identity, a judge ruled in new court documents. The woman alleges that Jay-Z and Combs sexually assaulted her in 2000 when she was 13 years old.

A federal judge says an Alabama woman accusing Jay-Z and Sean “Diddy” Combs of raping her when she was 13 years old can proceed anonymously for now with her lawsuit against the music moguls.

A judge has ruled that the Alabama woman who has accused Jay-Z and Diddy of raping her at 13 years old can remain anonymous for now in her lawsuit against the music moguls. The Associated Press reports that the woman,

In her written order, Judge Analisa Torres also chastised the lawyer representing Jay-Z for what she described as his combative motions and “inflammatory language” against the plaintiff’s lawyer, calling them inappropriate.

Z's effort to force the woman who has accused him and rapper Sean "Diddy" Combs of rape to reveal her identity.