The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Friday on the TikTok divest-or-ban law as it considers whether to give the company more time.

His tune changed, to put it mildly. After briefly meeting with Jeff Yass, a billionaire American investor in the app (and ...

A majority of the justices appeared more concerned about the national security implications of the popular app’s Chinese ownership than about the restrictions on free speech the law would impose.

In an unsigned opinion, the Court sided with the national security concerns about TikTok rather than the First Amendment ...

A U.S. ban of TikTok began to take effect on Sunday, capping a high-stakes battle that pitted the federal government against ...

Doesn’t the Constitution mean what it says? Doesn’t no law mean no law? Regrettably, today, no law means whatever the court ...

Lawmakers cited concerns about whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) would use TikTok to undermine U.S. national security. Calls for the ban gained momentum last spring during widespread college ...

Tulsi Gabbard, Trump’s pick to oversee US spy agencies, faces grilling at confirmation hearing Under a federal law that was ... The federal law, passed with bipartisan support in Congress last year, ...

FOND DU LAC, Wis. (WLUK) -- The man accused of setting fire to a Northeast Wisconsin congressman's office over the ...

The president-elect may be the Chinese-owned platform’s best chance to stave off a prohibition, but the path for doing so is murky.

The Supreme Court hears oral arguments Friday in a case over the future of social media giant TikTok in the United States.

Cute winter boots” has become a phrase some TikTokers are using to spread information about the Trump administration.